Date of Award
8-15-2021
Document Type
Open Access Thesis
Degree Name
MS in Physician Assistant Studies (PA)
Department
Physician Assistant Studies
First Advisor
Eric Van Hecke, PA-C, EMCAQ
Abstract
Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) continues to be the most common cause of death in the United States, and nearly every 34 seconds one American has a coronary event. Based on 12- lead electrocardiogram (ECG) findings myocardial infarction (MI) patients are treated, according to guidelines, emergently with reperfusion therapy if presenting with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), versus delayed revascularization if presenting with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). However, the evidence shows there is a lack of recognition of which patients require immediate catherization utilizing the current guidelines. In recent years, approximately 70% of acute MI (AMI) patients are classified as NSTEMI. Furthermore, it has been observed that approximately 30% of NSTEMI patients have total occluded coronary arteries (TOCA) on angiography yet face a delayed intervention approach that contributes to worsened clinical outcomes.
The current STEMI/NSTEMI paradigm lacks the accuracy in triaging patients who have a suspected acute coronary occlusion (ACO) or near occlusion, with insufficient collateral circulation, whose myocardium is at imminent risk of irreversible infarction without immediate reperfusion. A more recent emerging paradigm to determine who warrants immediate reperfusion is ACO-MI/Non-ACO-MI or Occlusion Myocardial Infarction (OMI) versus Non- Occlusion Myocardial Infarction (NOMI) for short. To answer whether the OMI/NOMI paradigm was superior to STEMI/NSTEMI in evaluating ACS patients, a literature review was conducted primarily utilizing the database PubMed, and certain full-text articles were obtained through Augsburg University’s interlibrary loan system. Overall, literature shows limitations of the current STEMI/NSTEMI paradigm and shows that OMI/NOMI paradigm has superior diagnostic accuracy and earlier recognition abilities for treating patients that present with ACS.
Identifier
SC 11.PAS.2021.Terzic.I
Recommended Citation
Terzic, Ismar, "Does Transitioning to an OMI/NOMI Model for the Evaluation of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Adult Emergency Department Patients Improve Outcomes Compared to Contemporary STEMI/NSTEMI Model?" (2021). Theses and Graduate Projects. 1132.
https://idun.augsburg.edu/etd/1132